![mp3 constant bitrate converter mp3 constant bitrate converter](https://www.anymp4.com/images/video-converter-ultimate/convert-audiobooks-to-mp3.jpg)
The subject is very complex and hard to generalize. Nearly all audio-apps use a LAME based encoder because the original Frauenhofer MP3 encoder is patented and doesn't allow modifications. Ok, I did a little research regarding the lame library (i.e. (.at least that is how I understand it to be.) the images have essentially been reanalyzed from the ground up to be transformed to an entirely new format. They would both be VHS representations of different quality images and neither would have a direct relation to the original image or to eachother with regard to "where the pixels went". they are both just pictures of a screen at which the camera is pointed. but when looked at as a whole through the new lens, they are seen as the same.
![mp3 constant bitrate converter mp3 constant bitrate converter](https://www.deskshare.com/help/dmcpro/MP3.png)
This is the case even though one image in its native form contains much more data than the other. the VHS camera is just recording an image of the HDTV as it is seen through it's lens.Īnd if you recorded the images from a CGA greenscreen monitor using the same camera, the recording would still use the same amount of tape and it would be a VHS image of what the camera "saw". you wouldn't wonder where all the pixels went. Like if you filmed your HDTV screen using a VHS camera.
#Mp3 constant bitrate converter 320kbps
and you are not gaining bits if you make and file is going into the "mp3 machine" where it is "listened to and analyzed" (so to speak) and a picture is taken through it's 320kbps lens (sorry for mixing metaphors). You can't really think of it like that since the files don't relate in that way.